Greg says Dean Barnett, who
like me thinks the Republicans will hold both houses, is living in fantasyland. I had to reply.
It's not just that the polls are inaccurate, it's that all their inaccuracies are skewed in the same direction. They don't care, either. It's not like there's some Olympic competition to see who can make the most accurate predictions. Their number one goal is to please their paying clients. They make a show of careful sampling, scientifically adjusting for demographic variations, and all that, but it's mostly just marketing hype. They do what they can reasonably do, but if a little bias creeps in, who really cares?
I think
Barone's April analysis had it right: this is a 50-50 nation, trending inexorably toward 51-49 or even 52-48. The trend is in the conservative direction. There may be an anti-Bush wave but there may not. Most people don't change their opinions day by day in reaction to the evening news. Below the surface there's also an anti-anti-Bush sentiment, and these people definitely don't talk to pollsters.
But there's another factor no one's talking about that I think works strongly in the Republicans favor: Voter fraud, or rather, the lack of it. The
recent indictments of the ACORN workers in Missouri were just part of a nationwide undercover investigation. I think there's a lot more to this story than has thus far been reported, and we won't hear about it until after the election. The people who are involved, however, know what's going on.
Not only is your typical fraudster a lower class of coward than the common thief, she has less incentive to commit the crime in the face of increased personal risk--after all, what's in it for her? A little intimidation here will go a long way, and as word gets out on the street that the Feds are serious about prosecuting voter fraud, I expect that the fraudsters will "stay home" in droves.